Non-Discrimination Policy and Complaint Procedures
Applicable Employee Classes:
Dr. T. Dwayne McCay, President
I. Policy of Nondiscrimination
Florida Institute of Technology (“Florida Tech” or “University”) prohibit students, employees, contractors, volunteers, and visitors (collectively, “community members”) from engaging in discrimination and harassment based on any individual’s race, color, creed, national or ethnic origin, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, genetic information, marital status, citizenship status, veteran status, and any other legally protected characteristic. This prohibition applies to all of the University’s educational programs and activities—including admissions—as well as all employment actions, including but not limited to recruiting, hiring, promotion, demotion, compensation, and benefits.
Florida Tech will investigate all complaints made under this policy and, if necessary, take action to prevent the recurrence of prohibited discrimination, harassment, or retaliation and remedy its effects.
This policy and complaint procedures are applicable to complaints that may arise under, and are intended to be consistent and compliant with, the procedural and substantive provisions of applicable state and federal law and regulations.
All faculty, staff, and students of Florida Tech must comply with this policy to help foster an inclusive and safe academic and work environment. This policy applies to the perpetration of prohibited discrimination or harassment by one member of the University community (faculty, staff, student, or volunteer) against another. The policy may also apply where one of the involved or affected parties is a visitor or a contractor performing work on behalf of University.
IV. Relationship to the Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy
Complaints involving sexual harassment as defined by the Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy shall be addressed exclusively through that policy and process. This policy addresses all other forms of sex-based discrimination, including sex-based harassment that does not rise to the level of sexual harassment as defined in the Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy.
Complaints of sexual violence and other forms of sexual misconduct that fall outside the scope of the Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy will be addressed through this policy as a form of sex discrimination.
V. Harassment and Discrimination
Harassment prohibited under this policy is defined as verbal or physical conduct (including conduct using technology) directed toward an individual because of their membership in a protected class (or a perception that someone is a member of a protected class) that has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with the individual’s educational or work performance, or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive working or academic environment. Harassment may also constitute “quid pro quo” harassment when a college employee conditions the provision of an aid, benefit, or service of the college on an individual’s response to prohibited harassment.
A person's subjective belief that behavior is intimidating, hostile, or offensive does not make that behavior harassment. The behavior must create a hostile environment from both a subjective and objective perspective and must be so severe, persistent, or pervasive that it unreasonably interferes with, limits, or deprives a member of the community of the ability to participate in or to receive benefits, services, or opportunities from the University’s education or employment programs and/or activities. In determining whether a hostile environment exists, the University examines the context, nature, scope, frequency, duration, and location of incidents, as well as the relationships of the persons involved.
Examples of hostile environment sexual harassment can include offensive jokes, slurs, name calling, intimidation, ridicule or mockery, or displaying or circulating offensive objects and pictures that are based on a protected class.
Discrimination prohibited under this policy is defined as treating someone differently because of their membership in a protected class (or a perception that someone is a member of a protected class) in matters of admissions, employment, housing, services, or any other educational programs or activities of Florida Tech. Disparate treatment discrimination occurs when there has been an adverse impact on the individual’s work or educational environment, individuals outside of the protected class have received more favorable treatment, and there is no legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the action. Disparate impact discrimination occurs when a University Policy or practice adversely impacts persons in a protected class even though the policy or practice is neutral on its face.
“Complainant” means an individual who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute discrimination or harassment in violation of this policy.
“Respondent” means an individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute discrimination or harassment in violation of this policy.
“Appropriate administrator” means an individual designated by the appropriate University Designated Official who will be involved in executing this policy.
VII. Complaints Alleging Sexual Misconduct
The types of Sexual Misconduct prohibited by this policy as a form of sex discrimination are defined below. Sexual Misconduct is an umbrella term that encompasses Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Non-Consensual Sexual Contact, Sexual Exploitation, Dating Violence, Domestic Violence, and Stalking as defined herein. It is important to note that Sexual Misconduct is prohibited regardless of the sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or gender expression of the Complainant or Respondent.
- Prohibited Conduct
- Sexual Harassment, which includes either of the following:
- Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment: Unwelcome conduct on the basis of sex that is so severe, persistent, or pervasive that it causes an unreasonable interference with the individual’s work or educational performance by creating an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment for employment, education, University living, or participation in a University activity or program.
- Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment: An employee of the University conditioning the provision of an aid, benefit, or service of the University on an individua’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct.
- Sexual Assault, which includes any of the following:
- Rape: The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without consent;
- Fondling: The touching of the private body parts of another person for the purpose of sexual gratification, without consent, including instances where a person is incapable of giving consent because of age or because of temporary or permanent mental incapacity
- Incest: Sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within the degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by law
- Statutory Rape: Sexual intercourse with a person who is under the statutory age of consent. The age of consent in Florida is 18 years of age.
- Non-Consensual Sexual Contact: Any touching (however slight) with any part of the body or other object, by any person upon another, without consent, for the purpose of sexual gratification.
- Sexual Exploitation: Purposefully taking sexual advantage of another person without consent. Sexual exploitation may include, but not be limited to, voyeurism; disseminating, streaming, or posting pictures or videos of another in a state of undress or of a sexual nature without the person’s consent; or exposing one’s genitals to another person without consent.
- Domestic Violence: Physical violence committed by a current or former spouse or intimate partner of a victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner, by a person similarly situated to a spouse or the victim under the domestic or family violence laws of Florida, or by any other person against an adult or youth victim who is protected from that person’s acts under the domestic or family violence laws of Florida.
- Dating Violence: Physical violence or the threat of physical violence committed by a person who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the person against whom the physical violence or the threat of physical violence has been committed. The existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on factors such as the length and type of relationship, and frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship. For the purposes of this definition, dating violence includes, but is not limited to, sexual or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse. Dating Violence does not include acts covered under the definition of Domestic Violence.
- Stalking: engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to (A) fear for his or her safety or the safety of others; or (B) suffer substantial emotional distress. For the purposes of this definition “course of conduct” means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means, including social media, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person, or interferes with a person’s property. “Reasonable person” means a reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar identities to the victim. “Substantial emotional distress” means significant mental suffering or anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling.
- Sexual Harassment, which includes either of the following:
- Relevant Definitions
- Consent: An affirmative and willing agreement to engage in specific forms of sexual contact with another person. Consent requires an outward demonstration, through mutually understandable words, conduct or action, indicating that an individual has freely chosen to engage in sexual activity or contact. Consent cannot be obtained through: (1) the use of coercion or force; or (2) by taking advantage of the incapacitation of another individual. Silence, passivity, or the absence of resistance does not imply consent. Consent can be withdrawn at any time. When consent is withdrawn, sexual activity must immediately stop. Prior consent does not imply current or future consent; even in the context of an ongoing relationship, consent must be sought and freely given for each instance of sexual activity or contact.
- Incapacitation: Incapacitation means the person is incapable of giving consent. A person is incapacitated if that person is in a physical or mental state that causes the person to be unable to make a knowing and voluntary choice to engage in the sexual activity or contact. A person may also become incapacitated due to many factors, including the use of alcohol and/or drugs, or when the person is asleep or unconscious, or due to intellectual or other disability. When determining incapacitation, the inquiry is whether a sober, reasonable person in the Respondent’s position should have known that the Complainant was incapacitated and could not provide consent. Evidence of incapacitation may include, but is not limited to, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, the smell of alcohol on breath, unsteadiness when walking, vomiting, unusual behavior, etc.
- Conduct, which can be verbal and/or physical, that includes intimidation, manipulation, or threats (either express or implied), that would reasonably cause a person to be in fear of immediate or future harm and that is undertaken to compel a person to engage in sexual activity or contact.
- The use of or threat of physical violence or intimidation, which prevents an individual from making a knowing and voluntary choice to engage in sexual activity or contact.
- Complainant Rights and Options
The Complainant shall be provided an explanation of his/her rights and options, which shall include a description of available options for, and assistance in, changing academic, living, transportation, and working situations, as well as information about:
- the importance of seeking immediate medical attention for sexual violence.
- other available health care and counseling services.
- the importance of preserving evidence for proof in the investigation or subsequent proceedings, or for obtaining a protective order.
- to whom the alleged sexual violence should be reported.
- options regarding notifying law enforcement and/or campus authorities, including notification of the Complainant regarding the Complainant’s right to:
- notify either police (local or campus) or campus authorities
- be assisted by campus authorities in notifying law enforcement if the Complainant so chooses
- the rights of Complainants and the institutions in notifying law enforcement of the protection, no contact orders, restraining orders, or similar lawful orders issued by a criminal, civil, or tribal court.
- the rights of Complainants and the institutions in notifying law enforcement of the protection, no contact orders, restraining orders, or similar lawful orders issued by a criminal, civil, or tribal court.
The University strongly encourages victims and other individuals to report all potential violations of this policy and medical emergencies. It is likely that many Complainants may be hesitant when it comes to reporting conduct that he/she believes violates another Florida Tech policy because of fear that they personally may be accused of violating policies in connection with the incident they are reporting.
Underage drinking is a common example of conduct that may have occurred during such an incident.
Because of the importance of reporting potential violations of this policy, and in order to encourage reporting, the University will not normally charge a Complainant who reports a violation of this policy, even though the Complainant may have participated in a non-violent violation of the code of conduct or University policy (e.g., unauthorized use of alcohol).
- Prevention and Awareness Programs
Florida Tech is committed to creating educational programs designed at preventing Sexual Misconduct, including sexual assault, dating and domestic violence and stalking as they are defined in this policy as well as in the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (“Clery Act”). Florida Tech’s ongoing educational and primary prevention and awareness programs for all faculty, staff and employees (including incoming students and new employees) are designed to: promote awareness; prevent sexual misconduct and relationship violence; and to remind the entire community of the University’s prohibition against sexual and misconduct and relationship violence, including sexual assault, dating and domestic violence and stalking. A description of the University’s educational and primary prevention and awareness programs can be found in its most recent Annual Security Report.
- Bystander Intervention
Bystander intervention refers to safe and positive options that may be carried out by an individual(s) to prevent harm or intervene when there is a risk of Sexual Misconduct, including sexual assault, dating and domestic violence or stalking, against a person(s) other than the individual. Safe and positive options for bystander intervention include: recognizing prohibited conduct and situations of potential harm, understanding institutional structures and cultural conditions that facilitate violence, overcoming barriers to intervening, identifying effective ways to intervene and take action provided that the intervention or action can be undertaken in a way that ensures the safety of the bystander. For more information about bystander intervention please contact the University’s Title IX Coordinator. A description of the University’s educational and primary prevention and awareness programs, including bystander intervention, can be found in its most recent Annual Security Report.
- Risk Reduction
Risk reduction is defined as options designed to decrease perpetration and bystander inaction, increase empowerment in order to promote safety, and help individuals and communities address conditions that facilitate violence. A description of the University’s educational and primary prevention and awareness programs, including risk reductions, can be found in its most recent Annual Security Report.
It is a violation of this policy to retaliate against any member of the Florida Tech community who reports or assists in making a complaint of discrimination or harassment or who participates in the investigation of a complaint in any way. Persons who believe they have experienced retaliation in violation of this policy can make a complaint in the manner set forth in this policy.
Retaliation consists of materially adverse action taken against a person because the person made a good faith report of discrimination or harassment or participated in the investigation of a report of discrimination or harassment, such as by serving as a witness or support person. Examples of retaliation include, but are not limited to: pressuring a person to withdraw a complaint, rumor spreading, ostracism, destruction of property, sending threatening text or social media messages, defamation of character, encouraging friends or co-workers to relay unwelcomed messages, taking negative employment action, or suspending a person from an activity or limiting their involvement because they made a report of discrimination or harassment.
A finding of retaliation or a threat of retaliation shall constitute a separate violation of this policy, subject to separate or consolidated disciplinary procedures, and is not dependent upon a finding of a violation of any other section of the policy.
IX. Bad Faith Complaints and False Information
Florida Tech encourages the good faith reporting of discrimination and harassment. However, the University will not allow this policy or the complaint resolution procedures to be abused for improper means. It is a violation of this policy for any person to submit a report that the person knows, at the time the report or Formal Complaint is submitted, to be false or frivolous. It is also a violation of this policy for any person to knowingly make a materially false statement during the course of an investigation, adjudication, or appeal under this policy. Violations of this section will be addressed under the Code of Student Conduct in the case of students and other University policies and standards, as applicable, for other persons.
X. Scope of Complaint Procedures
These complaint procedures describe the process for individual members of the University community (e.g., faculty, staff or students) to follow in the event they believe themselves or others, to have been victim of prohibited discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. These procedures also describe the required process for the investigation and resolution of allegations of such wrongful conduct by the University.
XI. Filing a Complaint
Complaints of Discrimination
Any person may file a complaint alleging discrimination or harassment in violation of this policy. Complaints may allege discrimination or harassment carried out by associates, students, or third parties. Complaints should be submitted in writing to the following University Designated Officials:
Title IX Sexual Harassment Complaints
All Other Discrimination / Harassment Complaints
A member of the administration, faculty, or staff that receives a complaint of discrimination or harassment shall immediately forward such complaint to the appropriate University Designated Official listed above.
Complaints involving Sexual Harassment as defined by the Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy shall be addressed exclusively through that policy and process. This policy addresses all other forms of sex-based discrimination, including sex-based harassment that does not rise to the level of Sexual Harassment as defined in the Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy.
Complaints of disability discrimination, including disability harassment, involving students, employees, or third parties will be processed pursuant to the procedures below, which constitute the College’s Section 504 grievance procedures. Complaints of all other forms of discrimination and harassment will also be processed pursuant to the procedures set forth below.
A complaint may also be filed with the above listed offices against institutional service providers, vendors, and other contractors. In such instances, Florida Tech shall determine, within its discretion, appropriate response and action.
Complaints involving prohibited discrimination, including harassment or retaliation, against a group or class of individuals, reflecting an apparent pattern and practice of discrimination, shall be investigated and addressed pursuant to these procedures by Florida Tech regardless of whether there is an identified Complainant.
XII. Third-Party Reporting
Any individual may make a report of discrimination or harassment. The report may be made without disclosing the identities of the parties involved. However, the University’s ability to respond to the third-party report of discrimination or harassment may be limited by the amount of information provided.
XIII. Employee Reporting
All University employees are strongly encouraged to report discrimination or harassment in violation of this policy when they receive a report of such conduct or witness such conduct. The report should be made to the appropriate office listed in Section XI above and should include all known relevant details of the alleged discrimination or harassment.
Employees with supervisory authority over other employees are required to report discrimination or harassment in violation of this policy about which they have information, except mental health counselors, pastoral counselors, psychologists, health services staff, or other employees with a professional license that requires confidentiality, acting in their professional capacity. Failure to report in accordance with this policy may be grounds for discipline, up to and including termination.
XIV. Confidential Resources
Confidential resources are those campus and community professionals who can maintain legally protected confidentiality within the University. The University provides confidential on-campus resources where someone may discuss the situation even if he or she is not sure about reporting the incident to the Title IX Coordinator or law enforcement. The following are designated confidential sources of support at Florida Institute of Technology:
- Counseling and Psychological Services
- Student Health Center
- Campus Chaplain-Catholic
- Employee Assistance Program (Staff and Faculty)
Unless a Complainant affirmatively requests the University take action in response to a report to one of these confidential sources, discussions with a confidential source are not considered a report to the University or a request that any action be taken by the University in response to any allegation.
Confidential sources may provide advice, support, and guidance about how to manage the situation as well as information about reporting options.
XV. Reporting Deadlines
Florida Tech encourages persons to make complaints of discrimination and harassment as soon as possible. Doing so enables the University to conduct a prompt investigation and gather the most current evidence.
There is no reporting deadline for complaints alleging violations of this policy, although the University’s ability to respond fully may be limited by the passage of time.
XVI. Criminal Violations
The University strongly encourages anyone who becomes aware of behavior that may constitute a violation of Florida State Law to report the incident to local law enforcement. The University can provide support, resources and assistance to those who do so. Information about campus security and local law enforcement agencies and how to make a police report can be found on the University’s website.
Except for complaints involving Sexual Misconduct, if a complaint involves potential criminal violations, the University shall notify the campus security and the President of the University. In cases involving allegations of Sexual Misconduct, the University shall inform Complainants of their right to: (1) to notify law enforcement authorities; (2) to be assisted by campus authorities in notifying law enforcement authorities if the Complainant chooses; or (3) to decline to notify such authorities. The University will comply with a Complainant’s request for assistance in notifying law enforcement to the extent it is consistent with law. The Complainant’s choice to report to law enforcement will not impact the implementation of accommodations and/or protective measures if applicable. The Complainant has the right to file a criminal complaint and a complaint under this policy simultaneously.
Regardless of whether a Complainant files a complaint with local law enforcement authorities, and regardless of any investigations or other actions taken by local law enforcement, the University will continue to have an obligation to undertake and duly complete its own internal complaint and investigation procedure.
XVII. Procedural Options
Any person(s) who believes they have been the victim of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation in violation of this policy, or who witnesses acts of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation in violation of this policy, may file a formal complaint with the appropriate University Designated Official as listed in Section XI of this policy.
If it is determined that a complaint falls within this policy, the appropriate University Designated Official or designee will contact the Complainant to determine which of the following procedural resolution options the Complainant prefers to utilize:
- Informal Resolution (not an option for cases involving sexual violence)
- Formal Resolution
The selected option will be verified by the Complainant's signature. Selection of one option does not preclude the Complainant from electing a different option later in the process, subject to the approval of the appropriate University Designated Official. Informal Resolution may only be utilized when mutually agreed upon by both the Complainant and Respondent.
If it is determined that the complaint does not fall within the scope of this policy, the appropriate University Designated Official will refer the Complainant to the appropriate office or department.
Upon receipt of a report or complaint of prohibited discrimination or harassment, the appropriate University Designated Official will review any confidentiality requests from the Complainant. The University will make all reasonable efforts to honor requests for confidentiality, to the extent permitted by law. However, it must be understood that while some concerns or complaints can be resolved without disclosing one's identity, successful resolution may not always be achieved under such circumstances, and the University’s ability to investigate the complaint or proceed with appropriate corrective or disciplinary action may be prevented or significantly hampered. Further, individuals who are directly accused of unlawful and/or discriminatory behavior and who, as a result, may be subject to disciplinary action, are entitled to a copy of the formal complaint and/or a summary of the charges against them so that they may prepare a proper defense.
The University will keep identifying information about complainants, respondents, and witnesses confidential in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, and such information will generally only be shared on a need-to-know basis with individuals such as investigators, campus security personnel, student affairs officials, and other officials who are involved in responding to the complaint or who are legally required to receive such information. All individuals who participate in formal or informal proceedings under this policy, or otherwise gain knowledge about the matter subject to the proceedings, shall treat all information acquired, whether written or oral, as confidential, provided however, that the parties to a proceeding may share such information with their personal advisors, advocates, and representatives.
The identity of, and identifying information about, complainants will not be disclosed in any public safety notices, final determination reports, or statistical reports that may be issued or made publicly available as required or permitted by law. If the University is compelled by law, such as through a subpoena or court order issued in a legal proceeding, or through a public records request, to provide such information to third parties, the University will make a reasonable effort, prior to complying with the request, to notify the individual, so that the individual may seek a protective order or take other actions as they may deem appropriate.
XIX. Threat Assessment and Interim Protective Measures
When the appropriate University Designated Official (or designee) becomes aware of a potential violation of this policy, they will, in consultation with other administrators, as appropriate, conduct an initial threat assessment to determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that the Respondent poses a continuing, significant threat of harm to the health, safety, and welfare of others or to the campus community, and whether interim measures are necessary to alleviate or mitigate that risk.
If the University determines that immediate action may be necessary to protect the rights, interests, or safety of the Complainant, Respondent or the campus community, the University Designated Official will advise the Human Resources Office and Dean of Students Office (if applicable) of the situation. Upon consultation with appropriate officials, immediate action may be taken which may include temporary changes in duties and responsibilities, directives to Complainant and Respondent regarding personal contact, warnings to the Respondent and, in severe cases, the immediate suspension of the Respondent pending the completion of a formal investigation. These remedial and protective actions may be coordinated with any similar actions independently provided by the University upon the request of the Complainant.
The University will maintain the confidentiality of interim measures provided to either a Complainant or Respondent, to the extent that maintaining such confidentiality does not impair the University’s ability to provide the interim measures in question.
XX. Participation in Investigations
All members of the University community are encouraged and expected to fully and truthfully cooperate with any investigation and resolution under these procedures. Employees who fail to cooperate and/or participate may face discipline, up to and including termination. In the event an alleged victim refuses to participate under these procedures, the University may proceed as a Complainant without the participation of the alleged victim where the appropriate University Designated Official determines that doing so is necessary to protect the safety of the community. In the event a Respondent refuses to participate, the complaint procedures will be completed despite the Respondent’s lack of participation and may result in a finding of responsibility in absentia.
XXI. Informal Resolution
The informal resolution procedure offers an option to discuss, evaluate, and resolve allegations of discrimination without beginning a formal Resolution/investigation. The informal procedure is intended to effectuate the resolution of a complaint by reconciling the parties' differences and/or rectifying the alleged discriminatory action(s).
Complaints that involve discrimination against a group or class of individuals or may involve criminal violations, may not be resolved through use of the informal resolution process. Informal resolution will also not be used in cases involving allegations of sexual violence. The determination of what is appropriately resolved through informal resolution will be made by the appropriate University Designated Official.
During the informal resolution process, emphasis is placed on:
- Identifying the source of the allegations/concerns(s);
- Exploring alternatives to resolve the complaint; and
- Instituting solutions to address the current concerns(s) and eliminate the possibility of similar issues occurring in the future.
The following steps shall be taken to resolve complaints in an informal manner:
Step 1: Notifying the Parties
Upon receipt of a complaint, the appropriate University Designated Official will determine if this policy applies. If so, the University Designated Official will notify the Director of Human Resources and/or the Dean of Students, as appropriate. The appropriate administrator shall notify and meet with the Complainant and the Respondent separately.
Step 2: Information Gathering
In an effort to fully understand the facts and positions of the Complainant and the Respondent, the appropriate administrator shall take steps they deem necessary to gather additional information from the parties or from others perceived to have knowledge of the allegations.
Step 3: Resolution or Next Steps
If all parties agree to participate in the informal resolution process, the appropriate administrator will make all reasonable attempts to resolve the matter within thirty (30) days. The specific details of each case will determine the best possible means for achieving a satisfactory resolution. If the complaint is resolved, the terms of the resolution will be reduced to writing and signed by the parties.
If the informal resolution process fails to resolve the matter to the satisfaction of both the parties, or the terms of the informal resolution are subsequently broken, either party may request a formal resolution/Investigation of the charge within 10 calendar days of concluding the informal resolution process.
XXII. Formal Resolution
The formal resolution process under these procedures consists of a fact-finding investigation to determine whether a preponderance of the evidence exists to support the allegation(s). Written findings shall be issued for all investigations. The formal investigation and related proceedings, which are described below, shall provide a prompt, fair, and impartial investigation and resolution of the allegations.
- Step 1: Complainant’s Written Statement
Normally, a signed incident complaint form containing a written statement of allegations initiates the formal process. In order to enable the Investigator to most effectively investigate the complaint, the written statement of allegations must contain a detailed description of the conduct being complained about, date and/or time period of the alleged conduct, the name(s) of the alleged offender(s), the name(s) of the alleged victim(s), the names of any alleged witnesses, and the name of the person filing the complaint. The appropriate University Designated Official or designee, with assistance from the Title IX Coordinator, as necessary, will assist anyone for whom completion of the complaint form is difficult or impractical. Anonymous complaints, and complaints filed by individuals who request confidentiality, will be investigated by the University to the extent possible pursuant to these procedures.
- Step 2: Notifying the Respondent
Once the complaint has been filed, the appropriate administrator will notify the Respondent(s) by written letter of its existence and provide the Respondent with a copy of the signed complaint.
The appropriate administrator will offer to schedule a preliminary meeting with the Respondent at which the appropriate administrator will: share the written complaint and details of the allegation(s); explain the Respondent’s rights and responsibilities under the process; describe any potential sanctions that may result from a finding of responsibility; and answer any questions the Respondent may have. At the preliminary meeting, the Respondent will also be provided with information regarding the Respondent’s rights, including the right to have the complaint heard under these procedures; the right to receive notice of all violations of this policy which have been reported, as well as any ancillary violations being alleged against the Respondent; the right to be heard by an impartial arbiter under this process; and the right to hear a description of all relevant information presented to the investigator(s) and adjudicator(s) that supports a finding of responsible or not responsible. Throughout this process, the Respondent will be informed of any new information that arises, which may impact the Respondent’s rights under this policy.
- Step 3: Respondent’s Written Response
The Respondent(s) will be provided an opportunity to file a formal written response. The formal response shall be filed with the appropriate administrator by the Respondent(s) within ten business (10) days from the date the Respondent(s) received the signed complaint.
If the Respondent fails to timely file a formal response and/or elect(s) not to participate in the formal resolution process, the case will proceed and be investigated with or without the involvement of the Respondent.
- Step 4: Investigation Process
Upon receipt of the Respondent’s written response, or if no written response is received after ten (10) business days, the appropriate administrator will initiate an investigation. The appropriate University Designated Official, with assistance from the Title IX Coordinator as necessary, will appoint an internal investigator(s) or an external investigator(s), or both, at the sole discretion of the University. University administrators will assist the investigator as necessary. The role of the investigator(s) is to analyze and document the available evidence to support reliable decisions, synthesize all available evidence—including both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence—and take into account the unique and complex circumstances of each case. The investigator is neutral, objective, and does not act as an advocate for either party.
The investigator(s) will provide the opportunity for both the Complainant and the Respondent to present witnesses and evidence. The investigator will interview the Complainant, the Respondent, and any relevant witnesses. The investigator is authorized to contact all persons who may have information relevant to the complaint and shall have access to all relevant University records. The investigator shall also collect and evaluate other available records and information relevant to the complaint and investigation (e.g. email communications, medical test results, photographs), as appropriate. The investigator(s) will determine, in the investigator(s)’ sole discretion, what information is relevant. Character evidence will not be considered; and pattern evidence (evidence of previous conduct) will only be considered if the previous conduct is so substantially similar to the conduct cited in the instant matter to indicate a pattern of behavior.
In cases involving Sexual Misconduct, past sexual history will typically not be considered except possibly where consent is at issue. Specifically, prior consensual sexual activity between the Complainant and the Respondent, while not determinative, may be relevant to determining whether consent was sought and received. Past sexual history may also be considered under very limited circumstances, for example, to explain injury. However, consent to one sexual act will never be considered to constitute consent to another sexual act.
Medical and counseling records are privileged and confidential. Therefore, those records will not be required to be disclosed.
If, during the investigation, the Complainant indicates a desire to withdraw the complaint, the Complainant shall sign a written statement of withdrawal containing the reasons therefore and the case may be closed at the discretion of the University Designated Official, as appropriate, after consulting with the Title IX Coordinator, as necessary. The appropriate administrator may continue to conduct the investigation and take action to address the issues raised by the Complainant regardless of the Complainant’s wishes if the University Designated Official, in consultation with the Title IX Coordinator, determines that doing so is necessary and in the best interests of the campus community.
The investigator shall maintain a record of the investigation, including any interviews, which shall be retained as an official record.
- Preliminary Investigation Report
At the conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will prepare a preliminary written report. The preliminary report will contain a summary of the alleged conduct in violation of policy; summary of the response to the allegations; summary of the scope of the investigation; summary of the relevant exculpatory and inculpatory evidence; and summarizes material facts on which the parties agree and disagree. The report will include copies of all relevant evidence received and considered during the investigation. Both parties will be provided a copy of the preliminary report and have three (3) business days to respond to it in writing. In their responses, the parties may ask clarifying questions, seek clarifying information, clarify information previously shared, offer additional comments, suggest additional witnesses, or identify any other relevant information or evidence to assure the thoroughness and sufficiency of the investigation. The Complainant and the Respondent may also request that the investigator ask clarifying questions of the other party, provided the questions are directly relevant to the complaint.
If, after receiving the written responses from the Complainant and the Respondent regarding the Preliminary Investigation Report, the investigator(s) determines that no further inquiry is required, the investigation will be deemed complete and final. If, in the sole discretion of the investigator(s), further inquiry is necessary, the investigator(s) will follow up on the information and ask any clarifying questions of the parties and witnesses before finalizing and completing the investigation. Any additional relevant information received and/or answers to clarifying questions will be included in the Final Investigation Report.
The final investigative report shall normally be issued to the appropriate University Designated Official within ninety (90) calendar days after the complaint is filed. When more than ninety (90) days is needed to complete the investigation, the appropriate administrator shall notify the parties and direct the investigator to proceed as expeditiously as possible. Allegations or evidence of violations of policies and procedures that are discovered during the investigation, but which are outside the scope of this policy, shall be referred to the appropriate office for resolution.
- Investigation Conclusion and Written Decision
Upon receipt of the final investigation report, the University Designated Official will refer the matter to the appropriate institutional official to reach a determination regarding whether the preponderance of the evidence supports a finding that the policy has been violated. In reaching a decision, the institutional official will review the final investigation report and meet separately with the parties to provide them with an opportunity to discuss whether any of the allegations are supported by a preponderance of the evidence and constitute a violation of policy. In advance of the meeting, the parties will be permitted to submit relevant questions to the institutional official to be asked of the other party. The institutional official will have sole discretion to determine whether the questions submitted are appropriate and relevant to the issues in dispute.
After reaching a determination, the institutional official will prepare a written decision that will include a statement of, and rationale for, each allegation that constitutes a separate potential violation of this policy, including a determination regarding responsibility for each separate potential incident. The written decision shall also articulate findings of fact, made under a preponderance of the evidence standard, that support the determination.
Unless otherwise indicated in the report, the date of the report shall be considered the date upon which the results of the investigation become final. The University Designated Official or designee will simultaneously provide copies of the written decision to the Complainant and the Respondent. The Complainant and Respondent will also be advised of the appeal process at that time.
XXIII. Advisor of Choice
The Complainant and the Respondent have the same opportunity to be accompanied to any related meeting or proceeding by one advisor of their choice for support, guidance and/or advice. The University will not limit the choice of the advisor or presence of the advisor for either the Complainant or Respondent in any meeting or proceeding, provided that the advisor complies with the guidelines for advisors outlined in this policy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the advisor may not be a witness and, in cases involving multiple Complainants or Respondents, the advisor cannot be another Complainant or Respondent.
The advisor's role is to provide support, guidance and/or advice only. The advisor may not participate in any manner during any related meeting or proceeding, including interviews. This advisor may not: (1) address or question the investigator(s), or other parties or witnesses; (2) present evidence or make arguments; or (3) have any role other than to accompany and communicate with the party requesting support and/or advice. The Complainant or the Respondent may request a break during any meeting and/or proceeding to allow the Complainant or the Respondent to confer with their respective advisor in private.
The University reserves the right to remove or dismiss a support/person advisor who fails to follow this policy and applicable provisions of the complaint procedures, in which case the party will be allowed to select a different support person.
The University may consider reasonable requests to reschedule a meeting or proceeding because an advisor cannot be present, however, the University is not required to do so and will not do so if it unreasonably delays the process.
XXIV. Appeal Procedures
Either party (Complainant or Respondent) may appeal the investigation finding. Such appeals shall be filed with the Title IX Coordinator, who will forward the appeal to the appropriate Appeals Officer. Parties wishing to file an appeal must do so within ten (10) days after receiving the final report.
The appeal process will not involve reinvestigation of the complaint. Appeals may be filed only on the following grounds:
- There is a substantial likelihood that newly discovered information, not available at the time evidence was presented to the investigator, would result in a different decision;
- There was a procedural error significant enough to call the outcome into question and the procedural error was either unknown during the investigation or the appealing party objected to the procedural error in writing prior to the issuance of the final report; or
- There was bias or a conflict of interest on the part of the investigator, provided that the bias or conflict was unknown during the investigation or the appealing party raised the issue of bias/conflict prior to the issuance of the final investigation report;
Appeal decisions (which shall include a statement of the rationale for the decision) shall be rendered within thirty (30) days after the request for appeal is received unless extended for good cause as reasonably determined by the Appeals Officer. Copies of the appeal decision shall be simultaneously provided to the parties, with a copy also to be sent to the appropriate Vice President and/or Provost.
XXV. Disciplinary Action and Remedial Action
If a complaint of discrimination or harassment is found to be substantiated, the University will take appropriate corrective, disciplinary, and remedial action to stop the inappropriate conduct, address its effects, and prevent its recurrence. Students, faculty, and employees found to be in violation of this policy will be subject to discipline, including but not limited to written reprimand, suspension, probation, demotion, termination, or expulsion. Affiliates and program participants may be removed from the University’s programs and/or prevented from returning to campus.
The University Designated Official, in consultation with the Title IX Coordinator, as necessary, will determine whether and to what extent ongoing support measures or other remedies will be provided to the Complainant. Remedial steps may include individual counseling, as well as academic, work, or transportation accommodations for the Complainant, separation of the parties, and training for the Respondent and other persons.
In matters where there is a finding that a student or other non-employee Respondent is responsible for violating this policy, the appropriate University official with disciplinary authority over the Respondent will determine any discipline to be imposed.
In matters where there is a finding that an employee Respondent is responsible for violating this policy, it will be referred to the appropriate Vice President and/or Provost, or their designee, who shall consult with the University’s Office of Human Resources and determine the appropriate disciplinary and/or corrective action in accordance with applicable personnel policies and collective bargaining agreements. The Vice President and/or Provost will be responsible for the implementation of all such disciplinary/corrective action measures.
In matters involving findings of Sexual Misconduct, written notice of the disciplinary determination will be provided to the Complainant.
A record of the outcome of each case will remain a part of the permanent file of the case maintained by the Director of Human Resources or the Dean of Students, as appropriate.
XXVI. Post-Proceeding Protective Measures
In appropriate cases, the Vice President and/or Provost, in consultation with the University’s Title IX Coordinator and the appropriate University Designated Official, may direct that certain measures be instituted or provided, to protect or safeguard the Complainant or victim of the misconduct, and/or to prevent or minimize the possibility of a further harmful incident or offense. Such protective measures may include: no trespass orders, no contact directives, counseling, reassignment of work duties, workplace relocation, referral to institutional offices capable of providing support, advice or other resources (e.g. Employee Assistance Program, Housing and Residential Life, Counseling Center, and Health Services), or any such other action(s) that may be described in the University’s policies and that are deemed appropriate under the circumstances.
XXVII. Presumption of Non-Responsibility
From the time a report or complaint is made, a Respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged misconduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made final.
XXVIII. Rights of the Parties
During the investigation and resolution of a complaint, the Complainant and Respondent shall have equal rights. They include:
- Receiving copies of all relevant policies which apply to the allegation(s);
- Written explanation of rights and options;
- Written notification of existing counseling, health, mental health, victim advocacy, legal assistance, chaplain and pastoral care support, and other services available on campus and in the community;
- Equal opportunity to identify and have considered witnesses and other relevant evidence;
- The opportunity to provide written questions to the investigator and adjudicator to be asked of the other party or witnesses;
- Timely notice of meetings providing sufficient time to prepare for meaningful participation;
- Similar and timely access to relevant information considered by the investigator;
- Equal opportunity to review any statements or evidence provided by the other party; and
- Equal access to review and comment upon any information independently developed by the investigator.
The University shall publish and make available to their students and employees, information about “available resources” for individuals who believe they are victims of, witnesses to, or are simply concerned about, discrimination and harassment.
XXX. Conflicts of Interest, Bias, and Procedural Complaints
The Title IX Coordinator, other University Designated Official, investigator, appeals officer, and informal resolution facilitator will be free of any material conflicts of interest or material bias. Any party who believes one or more of these officials has a material conflict of interest or material bias must raise the concern promptly so that the University may evaluate the concern and find a substitute, if appropriate. The failure of a party to timely raise a concern of a conflict of interest or bias may result in a waiver of the issue for purposes of any appeal.
XXXI. Academic Freedom
The University will construe and apply this policy consistent with the principles of academic freedom recognized by University policy. In no case will a Respondent be found to have committed discrimination or harassment based on expressive conduct that is protected by the principles of academic freedom recognized by the University.
XXXII. Vendors, Contractors and Third Parties
This policy applies to the conduct of vendors, contractors, and third parties. Persons who believe they have been discriminated against or harassed in violation of this policy should make a complaint in the manner set forth in this section. Third parties who violate this policy may be subject to sanctions by the University, including, but not limited to, loss of campus privileges, loss of future contracts, employment and enrollment.
XXXIII. Extension of Deadlines
All deadlines and other time periods specified in this policy are subject to modification by the University where, in the University’s sole discretion, good cause exists. Good cause may include, but is not limited to, the unavailability of parties or witnesses; the complexities of a given case; extended holidays or closures; sickness of the investigator, adjudicator, or the parties; and unforeseen weather events.
These procedures will be implemented by officials who receive annual training on the issues related to Discrimination and Harassment, including Sexual Violence, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking, and on methods and processes for conducting complaint investigations and proceedings in a manner that protects the safety of victims and promotes accountability.
Throughout all stages of the investigation and resolution, the University Designated Official, is responsible for maintaining documentation regarding the investigation including documentation of all proceedings conducted under these complaint procedures.
The complaint file (including the investigator’s notes, communications from the parties, investigation reports, determination letters, evidence collected during the investigation, and documentation of remedial measures) shall be retained for a minimum of seven years and shall be stored in a manner reasonably designed to maintain its confidentiality. However, nothing in this policy shall limit the University’s right to use the complaint file, or portions thereof, in connection with the University’s business, the investigation or resolution of other complaints, in the course of litigation, or in connection with any investigation by any government agency.
XXXVI. Outside Agencies
All individuals shall be informed regarding their right to seek redress through the following outside agencies:
Office of Civil Rights, Southeast Region
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, Suite 16T70
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-8909
Customer Response Center: (800) 368-1019
Fax: (202) 619-3818
TDD :(800) 537-7697
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Miami District Office
100 SE 2nd Street, Suite 1500
Miami, FL 33131
Tel: (800) 669-4000
Fax: (305) 808-1758
Florida Commission on Human Relations
4075 Esplanade Way Unit 110
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Tel: (850) 488-7082
Fax: (850) 487-1007